Terrorist group Hamas induces strange momentary memory lapse, with effect that psychologists haven't seen before.
The world of practiced psychology, the world over, has been buzzing with an exciting new piece of research. The latest development is that people are reacting strangely and uncontrollably to the word - "Hamas". Given the size of the development, it can be assumed that it is quite significant. Since the notice of the phenomena, recent reports from psychology journals suggest, the word is being excused from swathes of media reports without the application of mind. This was noticed with the amount of logical disconnect in the recently emerging news stories from Israel-Palestine.
Psychologists, noting the change, further deduced that the logical disconnect was forcing people curiously unaware of the situation to derive wrong impressions of what the truth of the matter actually was. They also linked the issue socially, saying that it was multiplying into ignorance of the larger political reality. This was remarked at the press conference held at the Psychologists' Association recently.
Reporters questioned the remarks, saying that it violated the scientific sacrosanct nature of the mental science. "You are crossing the line", the spokesperson remarked. But the scientists remained adamant showing them further data that such was indeed the case. "You certainly can't deny it", he added, along with the assertion.
When asked about whether Israel or Hamas was the actual culprit, he said that it was not the time or place to make any such comment. "Political affiliations", he said, "in all their complications, are personal. They must be kept that way. The issue is not of sides taken but of truth above sides taken. Truth must decide the outcome of personal opinionation, lest we fall foe fallacies."
Psychologists, noting the change, further deduced that the logical disconnect was forcing people curiously unaware of the situation to derive wrong impressions of what the truth of the matter actually was. They also linked the issue socially, saying that it was multiplying into ignorance of the larger political reality. This was remarked at the press conference held at the Psychologists' Association recently.
Reporters questioned the remarks, saying that it violated the scientific sacrosanct nature of the mental science. "You are crossing the line", the spokesperson remarked. But the scientists remained adamant showing them further data that such was indeed the case. "You certainly can't deny it", he added, along with the assertion.
When asked about whether Israel or Hamas was the actual culprit, he said that it was not the time or place to make any such comment. "Political affiliations", he said, "in all their complications, are personal. They must be kept that way. The issue is not of sides taken but of truth above sides taken. Truth must decide the outcome of personal opinionation, lest we fall foe fallacies."
Comments
Post a Comment